“If a human being thinks that beating should be in “arsenal” of communication with women and children then …”

“The discussion of the law on domestic violence has taken place in the” pro-Russian- pro-Western” perspective. That is to say, it is not about how much the law will benefit or harm, but rather what geopolitical camp the supporters of the law and opponents belong to.  The first ones speak of the “Putin Russia” or the “recruiting mass” of the Russian embassy in Armenia, the second – “the West’s compulsion”, “the perversion of GEy-roupe” and others, – “writes Aravot’s editor Aram Abrahamyan.

It is impossible to persuade both sides that they are mistaken, and should consider the draft law, not the ones standing or not standing behind it. It seems to me that if one is  “kyartu” and vulnerable, if he believes that in the “arsenal” of communication with women and children it is necessary to practice beating, then here Putin or Krivopuskov are not guilty. And on the contrary, if a person believes that the victims of domestic violence should have the extra opportunity to defend themselves, to raise their voices of crimes against them, Tramp and Macron did not take part in the formation of that conviction.

It is possible to fall in love with Putin and to oppose violence in the family. Can the United States be considered the embodiment of the globe and be the proprietor of the most marvelous and “abominable” morals in the family? … Levon Igityan is not able to communicate with women not because he is a fan of Putin”.

Full text in Armenian